Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_18.mat
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -9.72, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.11, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.10, deficit  2.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CCAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.19, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  86.61, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.70, deficit  2.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.67, deficit  0.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UCAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
ACAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.22, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GACC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -5.97, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.04, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.37, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CCCUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_57052.2,  3 NTs,                 GUCAC,score      -5.09, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.80, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGUAA 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.37, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GUUCC 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.30, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  80.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.58, deficit  5.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_80171.1,  5 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -4.26, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33                     
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
ACUCU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCAAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.83, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.49, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
AGCAU 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GAACC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCUAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -4.28, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GACAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.94, deficit  1.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
AGCGU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.84, deficit  1.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.47, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
CGUAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
UUCCA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_53189.1,  5 NTs,                 CUCUG,score      -4.79, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53                     
GUCUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.78, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUGCG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUCUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -3.84, deficit  0.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F                               
GAAAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.84, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GCAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -8.40, deficit  5.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGGAG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.35, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GUGUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.61, deficit  0.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -7.10, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.28, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CAUGCG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_30541.1,  5 NTs,                CAUUCG,score      -5.49, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F                             
UGGAAG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -11.92, deficit  8.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGUAGG 1  Matches 25; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.91, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAACAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.46, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCAACC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -8.35, deficit  2.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCUAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.59, deficit  1.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
CCGUAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -4.51, deficit  0.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.04, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
GAUAAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -7.41, deficit  0.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGAUGC 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
UGCGGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.72, deficit  1.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.69, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GUAGCC 1  Matches 16; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.99, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUAUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.52, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGGAAC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score     -10.00, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUUGCG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.47, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GGGGAC 1  Matches 23; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.41, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCUUCC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.70, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
UUCUUA 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.94, deficit  0.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAGAC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -5.72, deficit  0.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.48, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CACACG 1  Matches 10; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.91, deficit  5.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -6.00, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.64, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUAGCC 1  Matches 16; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.99, deficit  5.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAGAG 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CUGGUG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.87, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.64, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
CGAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -5.92, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAAAAC 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.24, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.52, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CAACCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_35894.3,  6 NTs,                UAGUAA,score      -8.38, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.21, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35                   
CAGUCG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_68529.1,  3 NTs,                GAGUCC,score      -4.09, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUAUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.52, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AAUCAU 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_01008.4,  5 NTs,                GAUCAC,score      -3.00, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.26, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F                       
GUGCUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -4.59, deficit  0.86, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GAGAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AGACGU 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -9.87, deficit  8.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGACAC 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.29, deficit  4.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.96, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.31, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
UGCAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.24, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGAAGC 1  Matches 26; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.43, deficit  3.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.91, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGCAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.24, deficit  3.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UCUAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.91, deficit  2.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.14, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CCGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.46, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
GGAGAC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.08, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAAC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.17, deficit  0.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GUGGUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -3.74, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GGGGGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -7.38, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUGCUUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -7.53, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.94, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUUGCCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -6.63, deficit  4.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUUAGUU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.83, deficit  1.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
AAAUGGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CGAAUAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.14, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
UCAGAUA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.56, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UUUAAUA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.53, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UGCAAAA 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.91, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAUCAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_50959.1,  6 NTs,               UGAUGAG,score      -7.83, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.17, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CAGGGGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_44730.2,  4 NTs,                CCUUGG,score      -6.84, deficit  1.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CAAGCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.62, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GCAUGAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score      -5.97, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CUCCUUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -7.61, deficit  3.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAAG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.46, deficit  0.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.20, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
GGGAUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -9.43, deficit  3.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.46, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GCAGACC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -6.54, deficit  3.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CGCAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUGCUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_62604.1,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.06, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35                 
GUAAAUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_24403.1,  6 NTs,               GAAAAUC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGUUAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -7.27, deficit  2.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
GUCACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.18, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
GGACGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GGAAUGC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.18, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
GGGUCGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -7.54, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GUUCGCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -4.67, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.95, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GAGAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.67, deficit  2.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGGUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -7.20, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35                                 
UGGAGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
CAAGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -6.09, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
AGCAAAU 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.92, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CUUUUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -4.65, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CAAGUAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_96487.1,  4 NTs,               CAUGUAG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUUCGCG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -4.73, deficit  0.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.53, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
AGUUCAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -8.12, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CCAAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.97, deficit  1.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.75, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GGGUUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score     -10.55, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
GUUAAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -7.10, deficit  1.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
GUAUGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -7.03, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CAAAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_27747.3,  6 NTs,               AGAAAUU,score      -4.77, deficit  0.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.37, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH         
CAAGCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_69774.3,  6 NTs,               GAAACAC,score      -6.60, deficit  2.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUGGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -6.11, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CCGGUAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.81, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CUGAAUG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -9.17, deficit  2.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
GAUAGGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02906.1,  5 NTs,                UGUAAG,score      -8.11, deficit  1.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.53, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35                 
GGUUCAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -8.28, deficit  2.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CGCUCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -8.74, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
AAAGAGGU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.75, deficit  2.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GAAACAGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -4.00, deficit  1.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.15, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GGCGGGGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.80, deficit  1.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUCAAGCA 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.33, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UGGUUCGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score     -10.00, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.86, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGAACUAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -5.27, deficit  2.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
GUUGUCUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score     -11.81, deficit  8.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.81, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CUCGAGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.76, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGUCAAGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.47, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CGGAUAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GUGUAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.42, deficit  4.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CAUUCAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
GUAUACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -6.39, deficit  2.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGCUUGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_93229.1,  5 NTs,               CCUUGAG,score     -10.77, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.34, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAAGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_49816.1,  6 NTs,              GAAAGACC,score      -6.01, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s55-s33                         
GGAAGUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.34, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
GUAUUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.82, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CUGUAAUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.40, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
UCUGGCAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -11.92, deficit  4.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UUUUAACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.15, deficit  2.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.44, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUCAACCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.03, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UUACGCCA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.43, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GGAGAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.66, deficit  6.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
GAGUAUGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score     -11.18, deficit  6.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
GAUUGCGU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_09712.1,  7 NTs,              UUCUGCGG,score     -11.07, deficit  6.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGCAGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -5.43, deficit  1.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CCGGUCAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.59, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUCUGAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -9.17, deficit  2.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
GUAUUCUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.82, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
CGAAAAAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_27359.1,  5 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -14.09, deficit  6.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.36, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55                     
GCCUAAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -13.27, deficit  7.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAGGCAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_44911.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -9.77, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F                   
GGUUUGGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.07, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
UAAAAAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.44, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GACAGGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.21, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGGAAUAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_56089.1,  7 NTs,              CCGAAUAG,score      -8.71, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35                 
CAGAAAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46771.1,  7 NTs,             AUUGAAAAU,score     -10.23, deficit  2.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35             
GAAGCGAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.86, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CGGAAAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CACAGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -8.00, deficit  4.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CUCAAAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60140.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGAAGAU,score     -11.69, deficit  4.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35                 
GGUCGAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGCAAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -6.54, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
GGGAUGGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -7.61, deficit  2.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.72, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
GGAAGAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
UACAAGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.68, deficit  2.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGUGAAAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -6.92, deficit  1.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AGAGAAAU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.72, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UGACGAAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -11.51, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUAAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.15, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  63.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CACAAAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.38, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UCUGAGAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -9.01, deficit  3.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GGAAGUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.27, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.98, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUUGAGUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -11.88, deficit  5.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UGUCGAAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.26, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CGGCCGGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_44769.1,  8 NTs,             CGCACGGAG,score      -8.68, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAUGGGGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_61092.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUUGGGAG,score      -7.90, deficit  1.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F                     
CUCUGAGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score     -10.01, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAACUGCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.54, deficit  1.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUGAAAAUC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -7.07, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.82, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
GCCUUUAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_36552.1,  6 NTs,             CCUCCUAAG,score      -8.22, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.55, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F                     
GGUUAAGAC 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score      -9.96, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
UGUAGGAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72066.1,  8 NTs,             UGUUCAAAG,score      -8.26, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35           
CUCAAGAUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -8.29, deficit  2.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
AGAGUAAAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -8.98, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.88, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CGCCGAGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -10.87, deficit  5.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
UUCAUUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.24, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GAAGAUUAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -8.40, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCAAAAAAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_05832.1,  7 NTs,             GCGAAAGAC,score      -7.70, deficit  1.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.47, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35     
CGAAAAAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score     -11.09, deficit  5.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUCAGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -8.80, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.51, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAAAUUGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -6.68, deficit  1.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GUUCAAUUC 1  Matches 11; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -3.59, deficit  0.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.41, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUUCUGUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.35, deficit  3.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.34, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
AAAGGUGGU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score      -9.10, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
UUCAUAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.90, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.85, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGGAGUAGG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -9.44, deficit  4.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
CUGUUAACG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.36, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.37, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
CGUCAUGGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -7.94, deficit  2.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
UUGUUUGUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -9.34, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGAAAACAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.97, deficit  3.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.80, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUGGAAAUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score      -8.18, deficit  1.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UGCGACUGA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_53760.2,  8 NTs,             GGUAAGUUC,score     -10.25, deficit  4.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CACACAAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_76406.3,  9 NTs,             GACAGAGAC,score     -11.38, deficit  6.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35         
CGCGUCGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.43, deficit  5.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUUGGCGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -10.51, deficit  4.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGUGUGAAC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_41207.1,  9 NTs,             UCUUUAAAA,score      -8.36, deficit  1.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35
CACGUACCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.56, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCAUCUCCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -10.45, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGAAUCCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score      -9.88, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CUAGACAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -10.85, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CUGUAAGUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_28085.1,  7 NTs,             CAGUAAAUG,score      -8.26, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F                   
GCAGUCGAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score      -9.87, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGUAAUCC 1  Matches  8; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -9.54, deficit  6.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGCUAACAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_63693.1,  8 NTs,            UGCAUAACAA,score     -10.96, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
UAUCAAAAA 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_03427.1,  7 NTs,             UCUCAUAAG,score      -8.18, deficit  2.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33                     
GGAAAAAAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -7.89, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.05, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUGGAUUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -11.08, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
UGAAGACUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score      -8.83, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.64, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGCUAAUGGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.85, deficit  0.97, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.27, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUAGUCACUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -10.11, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CAAGGGAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.71, deficit  3.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGAACUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -10.73, deficit  6.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.37, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
AGAAAUGGGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -12.67, deficit  7.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.49, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGUCAUAAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_94607.1,  7 NTs,           GGCUCAUAACC,score     -13.39, deficit  4.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53                   
GUUUGGAUUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -11.01, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.50, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GUGGGAAUCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.20, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCCUUGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.53, deficit  3.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.26, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGGGACGAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -9.71, deficit  4.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGUCUCCUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.06, deficit  6.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.81, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCUCCCAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.42, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.60, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAACGUUAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86843.1,  7 NTs,           AAAGCGGUUAU,score     -13.76, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35             
CUCGAUGAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -11.08, deficit  6.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GUGAAAAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score      -8.06, deficit  2.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
ACUAACUAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -13.69, deficit  3.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUGGCGACUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90642.4,  7 NTs,            GUGAAGAUGC,score     -10.16, deficit  4.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35             
CGAGAGACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -11.37, deficit  3.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CAAAUCGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -13.68, deficit  7.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAAGGGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GGAAGGAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.27, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.43, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
GUAGGGCGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -12.30, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.71, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CAUAGGAGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score      -9.35, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.95, ed 99, 2 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UUAAAAGACA 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -9.59, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAUUAGAUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -10.08, deficit  2.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  64.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCGGUGCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score     -10.95, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
CAGCGAUAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_41778.1,  6 NTs,           UAGAGGCCCAG,score     -15.09, deficit  7.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW                 
CUUUGCUCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08510.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUGCUUU,score     -11.48, deficit  6.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55               
GGGUUGAAAC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -11.42, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAUAACUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.39, deficit  6.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.69, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUUGACGUUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.55, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CCAAGGUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CGCUUUCAAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_33172.1,  5 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score     -11.83, deficit  7.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F                   
GGAGUUCAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -8.15, deficit  1.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUAUGGAUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -13.03, deficit  4.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.46, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
CGUCAAACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.35, deficit  6.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGUAAAAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score      -8.88, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.18, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCGAUUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -10.94, deficit  2.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.60, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GGGCUAGAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -13.30, deficit  6.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUCAUGAUUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score      -6.78, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CAGUCGAGAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.82, deficit  3.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGAAGCGUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UGAAGUAGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_51284.1, 10 NTs,            GCAAGGAGAC,score     -12.60, deficit  5.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
CCAAAGCAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score     -10.72, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CCUUACCAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.07, deficit  5.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
AGGGAAGGCAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.64, deficit  3.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.24, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUGUUGAUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_98252.1,  8 NTs,           AUUAUUUAUUU,score      -9.59, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.79, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53     
GUUGGUGUAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_91503.2,  9 NTs,           GUUCGUGGAGC,score     -11.64, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.09, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35             
UGAGCAAUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17956.1,  8 NTs,           UGAUCAAUGAG,score      -8.95, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  75.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35   
GCGGUCUUCAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_51090.1,  6 NTs,           CAGCUGGUCAG,score     -12.88, deficit  2.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F                       
CCUUUAGGGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -14.06, deficit  4.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUCUAUUAUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -10.79, deficit  3.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.06, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CUUGAACGAUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -13.99, deficit  6.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UUAAGAUAACA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -14.76, deficit  6.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.56, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAGAGGGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.06, deficit  5.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
AGACUCUUCGU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.83, deficit  4.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GUUGGAUCCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -13.69, deficit  8.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
CUGUUGAAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score      -9.31, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
UUGCUGAAACA 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -15.93, deficit  9.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.72, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
CUCUGGAUCUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_53037.1,  8 NTs,           CUAUGGCUAUG,score     -11.82, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55                     
GUAUAUGAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20891.1, 11 NTs,           CAAUAUCGAAG,score     -11.22, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.19, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55       
AGCUUCGAAAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.13, deficit  7.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUGCUAGCUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -13.46, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.74, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
UUUAGUGAGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.05, deficit  7.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUUGCAAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.50, deficit  7.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
CCGCAAGAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_35188.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCCUGGGAG,score     -13.04, deficit  6.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s35-s33-F                       
GGCGGUGCAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -15.15, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.50, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CAAUGGUGGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -10.51, deficit  1.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.24, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CUUUUCUUAUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score      -9.69, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.48, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GUCCCGUUGCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -13.02, deficit  5.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.69, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CAGGAAUUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -10.36, deficit  2.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.86, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUCUGUUUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -12.00, deficit  3.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
CUAAGUAGUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -13.13, deficit  5.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CGAUCCGGGGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.41, deficit  5.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.52, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCUUUUUGAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -14.21, deficit  8.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
UUUUCGCCAUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.06, deficit  2.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.13, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GCCUAUAAAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.92, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.06, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGACUUUGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -11.77, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.92, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
AAAGAUAAAAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score      -9.23, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.94, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCAGAAUCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -14.07, deficit  9.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUAAACUAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.21, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.38, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAAAAUAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -12.26, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CGAUUGUUAAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.29, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.39, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
UGACAGUGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -13.76, deficit  6.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.31, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUUUUGUAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -12.58, deficit  4.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
GGCAUUCGAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.76, deficit  7.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCGAAAAUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -13.15, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGAUUGCGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -14.68, deficit  6.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
GUGACAAAGAUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -10.90, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GUGUUAAGACUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.97, deficit  7.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.25, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACCUGAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -13.92, deficit  6.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGGCGAAUAGAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -12.32, deficit  3.78, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCUGAUAAUUUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -13.13, deficit  4.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.27, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
GGAUACCGAAAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.43, deficit  4.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.43, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUGGAGAGAGUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -17.48, deficit  9.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GACCUUGGUGAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_19239.1,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -15.59, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F                     
CAAUUCAGGGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
CGAAUGAUCGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -16.49, deficit  8.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
AUCGGAGCGCCU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.35, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.46, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUAAAAUGACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_30596.1,  8 NTs,          UCUAUGAUACCA,score     -12.33, deficit  3.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F                   
GAAAAGCAAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.91, deficit 10.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGACAGCGAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -10.21, deficit  2.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGUAGUCAAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_86109.1, 12 NTs,         GGGCGGUGGGAGC,score     -19.70, deficit 12.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35
GAAUUUAAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -11.93, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GGCCCUGAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_42671.1, 11 NTs,         AGCACGUGAAAUU,score     -14.99, deficit  6.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.76, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35           
GUUAUUAAAACC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -14.02, deficit  7.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GCUGAGAUUCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_22443.1, 11 NTs,          CCUGAGAAACGG,score     -15.01, deficit  8.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.90, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F
CGGUUCUAUUAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -17.05, deficit  9.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.51, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
UCUGUUGAGUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.15, deficit  6.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.47, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CGAACGAAAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.27, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.30, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCUACUUGGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_22576.1, 10 NTs,          CCUAAUUAGUGG,score     -15.32, deficit  6.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.56, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35         
CGAGUGAUAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GCGAUACAACUCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.70, deficit  3.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.24, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGUGGGGUUUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_68863.1, 11 NTs,         AGGUGGGGUUUAU,score     -14.95, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.61, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F   
CAACAGGCUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08602.1, 11 NTs,         CAAUCCGCUCUAG,score     -15.93, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.24, ed 99, 4 cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55 
UAGAUAGACGCCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_93221.1, 13 NTs,        GACCUAGAUCACCC,score     -15.13, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35 
UUUGUAAAGUGCA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -15.48, deficit  4.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUUCUAGAGAUUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -18.40, deficit  8.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
UGAAAAAAUCAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -13.06, deficit  5.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.64, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAGAGAACGACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_89082.1, 11 NTs,         GAAGAAUACGACC,score     -12.54, deficit  7.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.23, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35   
UAGCGGAUCGGAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -17.81, deficit  9.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGAAAAACAGGUAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_28843.1, 14 NTs,       UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA,score     -13.72, deficit -0.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.61, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35
CGAGCUAAGAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -19.21, deficit  8.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.42, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGCGUUAAGAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -18.19, deficit 10.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
CGUGUUACAAAGAAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98870.1, 12 NTs,     CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG,score     -18.28, deficit 10.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.30, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 85.1111	 78.2222	4
5	100.0000	 89.2222	 51.0000	23
6	100.0000	 86.6667	 51.6667	60
7	 99.5556	 53.8889	 16.0000	51
8	 99.5556	 27.5556	  5.1111	46
9	 98.5556	 18.3333	  1.7778	68
10	 94.8889	  6.7778	  0.1111	41
11	 83.5556	  3.4444	  0.0000	42
12	 44.3333	  0.3333	  0.0000	23
13	 18.2222	  0.4444	  0.0000	12
14	  5.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.2222	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  1.3333	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.6667	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.4444	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.1111	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   5 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence  11 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  23 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  24 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  26 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  44 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  55 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  58 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  60 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  63 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  66 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  72 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  74 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  84 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  90 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  94 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence 101 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence 113 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence 139 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence 140 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence 144 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence 145 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence 146 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence 146 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence 146 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence 148 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence 150 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence 155 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence 157 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence 159 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence 160 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 166 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 167 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 168 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 169 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 173 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence 174 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 175 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 176 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence 177 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 181 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 183 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 184 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 185 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 186 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 187 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 189 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 190 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 192 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 193 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 194 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 198 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 200 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 201 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 203 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 211 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 216 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 217 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 219 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 220 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 228 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 230 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 231 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 232 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 232 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 238 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 239 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 244 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 248 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 252 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 253 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 258 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 260 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 261 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 262 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 263 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 264 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 268 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 303 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 307 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 322 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 324 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 328 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 329 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 332 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 363 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 372 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 372 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 386 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 404 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 421 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 423 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 425 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 448 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 462 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 466 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 468 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 471 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 484 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 499 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 512 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 524 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 550 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 560 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 572 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 615 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 618 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 619 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 623 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 633 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 641 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 648 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 655 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 669 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 705 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 719 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 732 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 792 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 824 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 846 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 881 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 917 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 929 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 951 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 977 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 981 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 990 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 992 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 1003 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 1023 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 1328 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 1333 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 1462 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1810 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.3380%
Number of models giving false positives is 303 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.50
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.49
